In a surprising announcement, President Donald Trump stated on Tuesday that the United States would take control of the Gaza Strip following the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. Speaking alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump emphasized a vision of long-term U.S. ownership of the territory, which he described as an opportunity for significant economic development and stability in the region.
Trump outlined a comprehensive plan for Gaza, asserting that the U.S. would be responsible for clearing the area of explosives, tunnels, and debris left by Hamas. He expressed confidence in transforming Gaza into a thriving economic hub, suggesting that it could become “the Riviera of the Middle East.” “We’ll love it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous bombs and other weapons on the site,” Trump said, promising to create jobs and housing for the local population.
The announcement marked a notable shift in U.S. policy, as Trump had previously suggested relocating most or all Palestinians from Gaza to other Arab or Muslim nations. The idea of a U.S. takeover of Gaza, however, was entirely new and caught many observers off guard. Trump characterized the potential of the region as “unbelievable,” asserting that a U.S. presence could foster international collaboration and peace.
While a reporter raised questions about the legitimacy of the U.S. taking control of what was inaccurately described as “sovereign territory,” Trump refrained from addressing the query directly. Instead, he maintained that American control would enhance regional stability, allowing nations to work together towards peace.
Netanyahu, who had not previously expressed support for such a radical proposal, described Trump’s idea as “something that could change history” and indicated that it was worth consideration. Historically, the notion of transferring Palestinians from Gaza or the West Bank has been a sensitive and controversial topic, even within Israeli discourse.
Trump’s suggestion aligns with his past proposals regarding territorial acquisition, such as his interest in buying Greenland. However, the prospect of the U.S. assuming control over Gaza marks a significant departure from traditional foreign policy approaches and raises numerous questions about the implications for both the region and international relations.
As the situation continues to evolve, the international community will be watching closely to see how this bold proposal unfolds and what it could mean for the future of Gaza and its inhabitants.