Trump Signs Executive Order to Cut Taxpayer Funding for PBS and NPR: Calls Them Radical, Woke Propaganda

President Donald Trump has taken a significant step by signing an executive order aimed at cutting federal funding for PBS and NPR. This decision comes as part of a broader critique from the White House, which accuses these public broadcasters of promoting what it calls "radical woke propaganda."

The executive order directs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and other federal agencies to stop financial support for these media outlets. It also calls for an investigation into any indirect funding sources that may benefit NPR and PBS. The White House stated that this move is intended to end taxpayer subsidization of these organizations, which reportedly receive around half a billion dollars annually through public funding.

In a statement shared on social media, the White House emphasized that the funding cuts are meant to combat what they see as biased reporting disguised as news. This sentiment was echoed by Washington Times reporter Susan Ferrechio, who criticized NPR and PBS for their perceived lack of balance in reporting.

PBS President Paula Kerger responded to the order by highlighting the essential services that PBS provides to American families. She argued that the bipartisan support PBS has historically received is crucial for its mission, which includes educational programming for children and high-quality content for the public.

The decision to cut funding has sparked various reactions. Critics argue it could severely disrupt the operations of public broadcasting, which plays a vital role in informing the public. Additionally, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting has taken legal action against the Trump administration, alleging that the president exceeded his authority by attempting to dismiss members of its board.

This latest move against PBS and NPR is part of a larger pattern in the Trump administration’s approach to media and public broadcasting. The administration has also been working to dismantle the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees international news organizations like Voice of America. These efforts have faced legal challenges, with courts sometimes ruling against the administration’s attempts to restrict funding.

As the situation unfolds, many are watching closely to see how these changes will impact public media and the broader landscape of news reporting in the United States.

Scroll to Top