Donald Trump’s environmental policies are coming into focus as his administration embarks on implementing the recommendations of Project 2025, a conservative agenda put together by the Heritage Foundation. Despite Trump’s claims of having no ties to the project, data shows that his administration has already taken significant steps that align with its goals.
Since taking office in January 2025, Trump’s team has initiated or completed approximately 42% of the actions outlined in the 922-page Project 2025 document. The project includes over 300 specific action items, with nearly a quarter focused on environmental issues. This suggests that environmental policy is a priority for the current administration, with about 70% of the environmental agenda already in motion.
Project 2025 calls for major rollbacks in regulations intended to protect air and water quality. It also recommends cutting funding for clean energy projects and environmental justice initiatives. Additionally, there are plans to reduce the number of scientists and researchers working in these areas. One notable action includes withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord, which aims to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions.
Trump’s administration has downplayed the connection to Project 2025, with a spokesperson asserting that voters elected him based on his "America First" agenda rather than any specific document. They argue that his focus is on cutting unnecessary spending and restoring energy dominance while ensuring clean air and water for Americans.
The implications of these policies could be profound. Experts warn that weakening environmental regulations could lead to increased pollution and harm public health. For example, the rollback of California’s stringent vehicle emission standards could have ripple effects, as other states often follow California’s lead on environmental issues.
The administration has also taken steps to expand oil and gas leasing in Alaska and expedite the approval of liquefied natural gas projects, both of which are recommendations from Project 2025. These actions signal a clear shift in focus from the previous administration’s climate policies.
Critics of the administration argue that these changes are not just about energy independence but are also part of a broader strategy to dismantle environmental protections. The administration’s approach to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has raised concerns, especially regarding the potential impacts on wildlife and ecosystems.
As the Trump administration continues to implement these policies, the debate over environmental protection versus economic growth is likely to intensify. The actions taken in the coming months will shape the landscape of U.S. environmental policy for years to come.