The US Army Commemorates 250 Years of Service

Thousands of troops are set to march through Washington, D.C., today as the U.S. Army celebrates its 250th anniversary. This event, which President Trump championed, coincides with his 79th birthday.

Frank Langfitt from NPR spoke with people near the parade route yesterday. Many attendees were military families who traveled from afar to honor the Army, established in 1775. One veteran, Jerry Miller, expressed pride in his service and the country, emphasizing the need for Americans to appreciate and defend the U.S.

While there was excitement about the parade, not everyone shared the same enthusiasm. Concerns were raised about the estimated cost of the event, ranging from $25 to $45 million, especially as the administration is looking to cut expenses. Others worried about potential damage to D.C. streets from heavy military vehicles, which required protective measures. The most significant criticism, however, focused on the display of military might in the nation’s capital, with some viewing it as a show of power by President Trump.

Gavin Schmidt, a political moderate visiting from Albuquerque, shared his discomfort with the parade, suggesting it reflects an authoritarian approach. His wife, Danielle, echoed this sentiment, comparing the display to tactics used by dictators in other countries.

Military parades are rare in the U.S., with the last one occurring in 1991 after the Gulf War. In contrast, such parades are common in other nations. Langfitt recounted his experience covering a massive military parade in China, where the government restricted citizens from watching due to fears of protests. He noted that the upcoming parade in D.C. is quite different, as tickets are easily available, though President Trump has warned that any protests would be met with a strong response.

As the parade approaches, Langfitt mentioned he couldn’t preview the tanks and other military equipment, as they were kept hidden behind barriers. It remains unclear whether this was for dramatic effect or a response to the controversy surrounding the event.

The parade is expected to draw a mixed crowd, with many eager to celebrate the Army’s history while others voice their concerns about the implications of such a display.