Senator Van Hollen Meets with Abrego Garcia; El Salvador Confirms Inmate Will Stay in Custody

Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland recently traveled to El Salvador to meet Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a deported illegal immigrant. Van Hollen had faced several obstacles in arranging this meeting but was finally granted access on Thursday night.

Garcia, 29, had been living in Maryland before his deportation to a notorious prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) in El Salvador. His deportation was initially deemed an administrative error, but some officials have argued that he is a member of the MS-13 gang, which complicates the situation further. A federal court and the Supreme Court have both ordered the Trump administration to ensure Garcia’s return to the U.S. for proper deportation proceedings.

Van Hollen announced his plans to visit Garcia earlier in the week, and other Democratic lawmakers expressed interest in doing the same. Upon arrival, he learned that El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele was out of the country, so he met with Vice President Félix Ulloa. Van Hollen requested to see Garcia directly but was told he needed to arrange the visit in advance.

Despite being denied initially, Van Hollen persisted. He stated, “We were there for one simple reason: to check on his well-being, which his family and lawyers have not been allowed to do.” His efforts paid off, and he was eventually able to meet Garcia. Photos from their meeting showed them sitting together in a tropical setting, with drinks at hand.

The circumstances surrounding Garcia’s deportation have raised significant controversy. While some officials argue that he should remain in El Salvador due to his alleged gang affiliations, others contend that he deserves a fair process in the U.S. The Department of Justice had sought to block a judge’s order for Garcia’s return, but a federal appeals court denied their request, emphasizing the need for the original court to carry out its ruling.

Van Hollen’s visit highlights the ongoing debates around immigration policy and the treatment of individuals who find themselves caught in complex legal situations. As the story develops, it raises questions about the balance between national security and individual rights.

Scroll to Top