California Governor Gavin Newsom has taken decisive action in the wake of the state’s recent devastating wildfires by issuing an executive order that suspends permitting and review requirements for rebuilding efforts. This move aims to expedite the recovery process for affected communities, allowing residents to reconstruct their homes and businesses more swiftly. Newsom’s directive also instructs state agencies to identify additional regulations that could be safely suspended or streamlined to facilitate faster rebuilding.
This decision raises a significant question about the necessity of certain building regulations in California. Progressive writer Marc J. Dunkelman, who is set to publish a book titled "Why Nothing Works: Who Killed Progress—and How to Bring It Back," argues that some regulations may no longer be needed. Dunkelman contends that the progressive movement’s historical wariness of concentrated power has inadvertently weakened the administrative state, making it difficult for governments to effectively address major issues like infrastructure and corporate regulation.
Dunkelman highlights the contrast between historical and contemporary project timelines, citing the rapid construction of New York City’s subway system in the early 1900s, which took just three years for its first line. In contrast, he notes that similar large-scale projects today can take years or even decades to complete due to extensive regulatory reviews and permitting processes. He attributes this slowdown to a system where nearly any objection—whether from residents, activists, or local officials—can halt progress.
While acknowledging the importance of public input in development decisions, Dunkelman argues that the current system has swung too far, making it nearly impossible to move forward without facing significant delays. He points to the housing crisis in the United States, where a lack of available homes has driven up prices, as a direct consequence of these protracted approval processes.
During an interview with NPR’s Steve Inskeep, Dunkelman addressed the perception that progressive policies have contributed to the government’s diminished credibility. He noted that while these initiatives were well-intentioned, the outcome has often been inefficiency and frustration. He believes that for progressives to regain public trust, they must focus on improving the operational effectiveness of government.
Dunkelman also cited the stalled transmission line project intended to bring clean hydroelectric power from Canada to New England as an example of how progressive regulatory efforts can inadvertently hinder beneficial initiatives. He pointed out that while protecting local communities and environments is essential, excessive barriers can prevent the realization of clean energy solutions.
As discussions continue about the balance between regulation and progress, Dunkelman warns that a system where every stakeholder has a veto can lead to stagnation. He emphasizes the need for a more streamlined approach to development that allows for both community input and the ability to move forward with necessary infrastructure projects. The challenge lies in finding a middle ground that respects individual rights while also enabling the country to build and improve effectively.