As President Trump’s tariffs continue to impact the global economy, some Republicans in Congress are starting to voice their concerns. A few lawmakers are pushing to limit Trump’s power to impose tariffs, marking a rare moment of dissent within the party.
While many Republican leaders have opted to take a cautious approach, waiting to see how the tariffs affect the economy and the stock market, others are eager for action. House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that Congress would consider the tariffs but emphasized the need to support the president’s efforts to boost the economy and balance trade.
In a more proactive stance, Senator Chuck Grassley from Iowa has introduced the Trade Review Act of 2025. This bipartisan bill, co-sponsored by Senator Maria Cantwell from Washington, would require the president to inform Congress of any new tariffs within 48 hours and provide a rationale for their implementation. Congress would then have 60 days to review these tariffs.
Grassley expressed his belief that Congress has relinquished too much trade authority to the executive branch over the years. He posted on social media, stressing the need for Congress to reclaim its role in trade policy.
On the House side, Representative Don Bacon from Nebraska plans to introduce a similar measure. He echoed Grassley’s sentiments, arguing that significant changes in tariff policy should come from Congress, not the president.
Support for this legislation is growing among Republican lawmakers, particularly from California. Representative David Valadao, who represents a crucial swing district, indicated he is open to reviewing Bacon’s proposal. Valadao emphasized the importance of restoring congressional power over tariffs, a responsibility the founding fathers intended for the legislative branch.
Valadao, who has firsthand experience as a dairy farmer, noted that he has heard mixed opinions from his constituents regarding the tariffs. Some are struggling with international competition, while others advocate for higher tariffs to protect American industries.
As concerns about a looming recession grow, more Republicans are weighing in on the issue. Senator Deb Fischer from Nebraska acknowledged the importance of having input on tariffs, even as she suggested giving the president time to assess their impact.
Meanwhile, Trump remains steadfast in his approach, recently threatening to impose additional tariffs on China in response to their retaliatory measures. His administration has indicated that he would veto any bill aimed at restricting his tariff powers.
The legal foundation for Trump’s tariffs is being challenged as well. The New Civil Liberties Alliance has filed a complaint arguing that the tariffs are unconstitutional. They claim Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs is not permitted under the law.
Bacon, speaking on CBS News, stated that the current situation is not an emergency but rather a shift in tariff policy that requires congressional oversight.
In addition to these developments, a separate bill introduced by Virginia Democrats aims to end the national emergency that Trump declared over the fentanyl crisis, which is linked to tariffs on Canada.
As the debate over tariffs continues, it highlights the tension between the executive branch’s authority and Congress’s constitutional role in regulating trade. The outcome of this legislative push could significantly shape the future of U.S. trade policy and the economy.