Exploring the Various Ways Individuals Are Vanishing from Government Websites

Across the United States, government agencies are quietly removing images and references to women, people of color, and LGBTQ+ individuals from their websites. This trend has raised concerns among advocates and historians about the potential erasure of diverse histories and identities.

In February, the Small Business Administration (SBA) removed a photo that depicted a diverse group of people smiling together. This change was made abruptly, as internal sources described the urgency of the task as unusual, likening it to addressing a system failure. The SBA did not respond to requests for comment regarding this decision.

This pattern of removal is not isolated. Many federal agencies have been instructed to comply with executive orders aimed at eliminating "diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility" programs. These orders have led to a systematic scrubbing of content that acknowledges the contributions and existence of marginalized groups. While some content has been restored as agencies grapple with compliance, the impact of these removals is significant.

For instance, the Department of Veterans Affairs has acknowledged that excluding certain groups from its website can hinder its ability to deliver services effectively. The removals are particularly concerning for transgender and non-binary individuals, who have faced the most consistent erasure from government platforms.

Historians warn that such systematic erasure has historically preceded the stripping of rights from marginalized communities. Alessio Ponzio, a researcher focused on LGBTQ history, stated, "If you erase the memory, we really forget the people." This sentiment underscores the psychological impact of being rendered invisible by government actions.

In recent months, various agencies, including the Department of Education and the Defense Department, have implemented measures that remove or alter content related to women and people of color. For example, the Defense Department issued a memo instructing the military to eliminate digital content that focuses on immutable characteristics like race and sex.

The repercussions of these actions extend beyond mere content removal. The Department of Veterans Affairs has proposed editing its communications to exclude terms like "gender" and to drop the "T" from "LGBTQ+ Care." This move raises alarms about the potential impact on access to care for transgender veterans, who already face higher suicide rates compared to their peers.

The situation has sparked public outcry. Advocates argue that these removals send a message that non-white, non-male identities are unwelcome in government narratives. The Pentagon has flagged tens of thousands of images for removal, many featuring women and people of color, which has drawn criticism from various advocacy groups.

As this trend continues, voices from within and outside the government are calling for a reconsideration of these policies. The erasure of diverse identities not only affects historical recognition but also has real-world implications for the individuals and communities that these policies impact.

Scroll to Top