The recent signing of a peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda in Washington has sparked a mix of reactions. Former Congolese president Joseph Kabila has criticized the deal, calling it "nothing more than a trade agreement." The agreement, signed on Friday, focuses on the disengagement, disarmament, and conditional integration of armed groups in eastern DRC, but lacks specific details.
While some see the agreement as a potential turning point in a long-standing conflict, others remain skeptical. The conflict in eastern DRC has intensified this year, particularly with the M23 rebel group seizing control of significant territory, including the regional capital, Goma, and two airports. This surge in violence has resulted in thousands of deaths and has displaced hundreds of thousands of civilians.
In a bid for support, the DRC government sought assistance from the U.S., reportedly offering access to valuable minerals in exchange for security guarantees. Eastern DRC is rich in resources like coltan, which are essential for the global electronics industry.
Kabila raised concerns about the participants in the signing ceremony, questioning why the DRC was not at war with the signatories present, including U.S. officials and Rwanda’s foreign minister. He pointed out the absence of M23 representatives and emphasized that the Congolese people deserve honesty, not a "diplomatic show."
Residents in Goma echoed Kabila’s sentiments, expressing frustration over the lack of M23 involvement in the peace talks. Many are weary of negotiations and simply want peace. One local motorbike rider voiced that people are tired of talks and just want stability.
Human rights advocates have also criticized the agreement. Sam Zarifi, from Physicians for Human Rights, highlighted that the deal overlooks essential issues, stating that true peace cannot exist without justice. He noted that the agreement fails to address the role of proxy armed groups in ongoing violence.
On a more optimistic note, some local leaders see the signing as a hopeful step. Stephanie Marungu, who heads a humanitarian organization in Goma, believes the agreement could lead to increased stability and improve aid delivery to those in need. However, she also acknowledged potential challenges in making the agreement work.
As the situation unfolds, there are concerns that the deal might benefit a select few with access to the DRC’s mineral wealth, leaving ordinary citizens to struggle. The future remains uncertain, but many are watching closely to see if this agreement will lead to lasting peace in a region that has suffered for far too long.