The Trump administration has taken a bold step by filing a lawsuit against all 15 federal judges in Maryland. This unusual move comes after a judge issued an order that blocks the immediate deportation of migrants who are challenging their removals. The lawsuit highlights the administration’s frustration with the federal judiciary and its ongoing battle over immigration enforcement.
The issue began when Chief Judge George L. Russell III signed an order in May. This order prevents the government from deporting immigrants who file for a review of their detention until two business days after their petitions are submitted. The administration argues that this pause violates a Supreme Court ruling and hinders the president’s ability to enforce immigration laws.
Laurie Levenson, a professor at Loyola Law School, called the lawsuit "extraordinary." She noted that it escalates the Justice Department’s attempts to confront federal judges. The administration is clearly unhappy with the repeated judicial decisions that have blocked various executive actions.
In a statement, Attorney General Pam Bondi expressed the administration’s view that these judicial actions undermine President Trump’s authority. She stated, "The American people elected President Trump to carry out his policy agenda," and criticized what she sees as judicial overreach.
The lawsuit also names Judge Paula Xinis, who has ruled against the administration in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an immigrant deported to El Salvador. Garcia’s attorneys have asked Judge Xinis to impose fines on the administration for not complying with court orders.
The judges involved in the lawsuit have not commented publicly. However, the order signed by Judge Russell aims to ensure that immigrants can participate in court proceedings and access legal representation. It also allows the government time to present its arguments.
The Trump administration has asked the Maryland judges to step aside from the case, requesting that a judge from another state handle it instead. This request reflects the administration’s broader strategy to challenge judicial decisions it views as unfavorable.
James Sample, a constitutional law professor, criticized the lawsuit as part of a troubling trend where the administration is eroding legal norms. He pointed out that typically, when parties lose an injunction, they appeal rather than sue the judges involved.
In summary, the Trump administration’s lawsuit against the Maryland judges marks a significant escalation in its ongoing conflict with the federal judiciary. It underscores the administration’s determination to assert its immigration policies despite legal challenges. As this situation unfolds, it raises important questions about the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary.