White House Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett expressed strong confidence that courts will support President Donald Trump’s tariff policies. During an appearance on ABC’s "This Week," he reassured viewers that the administration believes its legal strategy will prevail.
Hassett stated, "We’re very thrilled. We are very confident that the judges would uphold this law." He emphasized that the White House is focused on what he called "Plan A," which they believe will be sufficient to enforce the tariffs.
The context of Hassett’s remarks comes after a federal court recently ruled against Trump’s tariffs. However, an appeals court granted a temporary stay, allowing the tariffs to remain in effect while the legal battle continues. This stay means that Trump can still impose a 10% baseline tariff and other tariffs announced earlier this year under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Hassett highlighted the urgency of the situation, pointing out the severe impact of fentanyl on American lives. He argued that if a judge were to rule that the opioid crisis does not constitute a national emergency, it would be a "ludicrous statement." He assured that the administration has alternative plans if necessary.
The legal landscape surrounding the tariffs is complicated. While the appeals court’s stay allows Trump to continue implementing the tariffs, the judges noted that the president does not have unlimited authority under emergency laws. This ruling follows a unanimous decision from the U.S. Court of International Trade that blocked the tariffs just days earlier.
The government now faces the challenge of proving that they would suffer "irreparable harm" if the injunction against the tariffs remains. This is a high legal standard to meet, and the outcome of this ongoing legal dispute could have significant implications for U.S. trade policy.
Hassett’s comments reflect the administration’s determination to push forward with its tariff agenda despite legal hurdles. As the situation develops, many will be watching closely to see how the courts respond and what impact this will have on American businesses and consumers.