Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, recently shared his thoughts on former President Donald Trump’s proposed Golden Dome defense system for the United States. In an interview published on May 23, 2025, O’Hanlon evaluated the feasibility and strategic value of this ambitious plan.
The Golden Dome defense system is designed to protect the U.S. from missile threats. Trump has touted it as a cutting-edge solution to enhance national security. However, O’Hanlon raised concerns about whether this system is realistic and if it would actually be effective.
During the discussion, O’Hanlon pointed out the complexities involved in implementing such a defense system. He questioned both the technical capabilities required and the financial implications of building and maintaining it. The expert emphasized the importance of considering whether this strategy would truly bolster U.S. defense or simply serve as a political talking point.
As the debate continues, the conversation around the Golden Dome defense system reflects broader discussions about national security and military spending in the current political climate. O’Hanlon’s insights highlight the need for careful evaluation of new defense initiatives, especially those that promise significant advancements but may not be grounded in practical reality.